Hiring? Here’s a Reason To Use a Formal Monitoring Service

It’s no surprise that hiring managers are turning to social media when making hiring decisions; in fact, research indicates that at least half of hiring managers will use social media research. Job candidates are encouraged to clean up their public facing social media content when job seeking, and with good reason.

However, before your firm takes to social media research to further vet potential candidates, it’s important to have the right safeguards in place to be sure that your methods are not controversial or lead to problems later on.

I recently came across a study that looked at discrimination in hiring practices, specifically related to social media research. Carnegie Mellon conducted a study to look at such discrimination. The article explains the study as follows:

“Alessandro Acquisti and Christina M. Fong of Carnegie Mellon University recently conducted a large-scale field experiment about social media use in hiring. First they created Facebook profiles for fictional job candidates, striving to make them identical, except for indications of religious affiliation (listed as Christian or Muslim) or sexuality (gay versus straight). Next they submitted applications for these fictional job candidates to more than 4,000 employers. These did not indicate religious affiliation or sexuality. The only way to determine the candidates’ religious preference or sexual orientation was to search for and examine their Facebook profiles.

About 33% of the companies in the sample seem to have examined the candidates’ social media profiles. The researchers found no statistically significant discrimination against gay candidates. They did, however, find that employers in Republican areas of the United States (based on election results) exhibited significant bias when extending interview invitations — against Muslim applicants, and in favor of Christian applicants. In the 10 states with the highest percentage of votes for the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, only about 2% of the Muslim applicants were invited for interviews, compared with about 17% of the Christian applicants.”

While this is one study, the article states that these statistics fall in line with other similar studies.

It’s a well known fact that factors such as race, religion, and marital status cannot be used in consideration of a potential employee; I don’t think that hiring managers seek out this information, but do come across it when conducting basic social media research, which typically includes a Google search or even searching for a candidate on Facebook. However, when doing so, one cannot “unsee” this type of information, and it is very difficult to prove that the specific information that cannot be used for consideration wasn’t.

So, what’s a hiring manager to do?

Simply put, hiring managers need to turn to third party services for such social media research, or social media background checks as they’re often referred to. The background checks conducted by third party vendors have built in benefits that many do not even consider when using social media to research candidates, such as:

  • The searches are more comprehensive than a typical Google search: it takes a lot of time to manually research a person using Google, and even longer to cross reference potential content that may be tied to a candidate, or tied to someone with a similar name. The programs used for third party services is intuitive, deep, and efficient in determining identity.
  • You don’t see what you’re not supposed to: formal social media background checks are compliant with the FCRA, and will not provide content that falls within protected data. There is no opportunity to “see” something that shouldn’t been seen. The good news is that, should hiring practices be questioned, it will be much easier to prove that the data used in the decision making process was compliant.
  • A third party source creates a layer of protection: using a third party vendor for social media background checks can give weight to the social content collected and used as part of the hiring process. By showing that it is an independent source, it can be helpful in protecting the company with regard to its hiring practices.

Social media content is a valuable tool in ensuring you hire the right people; the right hiring decisions lead to the strongest team. It’s wise to be as cautious as possible to avoid any potential issues, and using a third party source might be the best bet for your hiring managers to take advantage of.

Best Practices For New Hires, Employees, & Former Employees

 

Social media adds a whole new layer to the employment process, particularly from a Human Resources and Corporate standpoint. It’s no longer “just” social media – the online conversations provide a wealth of information that is easily collected and used to make many decisions, and employment issues are no different.

From the hiring process to dealing with former employees, there are many key points related to social media that companies need to consider.

 

1. Pre-employment/hiring process: it’s no secret (or surprise) that Human Resources departments are turning to social media to learn more about candidates. This information is another layer that helps them make good decisions during the hiring process. More than a Google search, social media research can dig deep to find out more about a candidate through what he/she posts online. Here are some tips to make sure this is an effective process that keeps you safe legally:

  • Develop a written policy that explains how social media content is used in the hiring process. State what can and cannot be collected to be used to make a hiring decision. Aspects like religious beliefs and marital status, for example, cannot be used in the decision making process. Make sure the policy is clear and detailed so there is little room for potential candidates being able to sue on the basis of discrimination.
  • Use a third party to conduct the search: the hiring manager ideally should not be the one conducting the social media scan; this alleviates any potential or perceived bias. Using another individual to conduct the searches will provide a layer of protection, as they only provide relevant information that can be used in the decision making process to the hiring manager. This protects the hiring manager in that if he/she doesn’t ever see the other social content, they could not have used it. For this reason, many companies chooses to outsource the social media monitoring process, as these firms use sophisticated programs and are aware of HR laws, so you will only be provided with the most relevant, legally allowed information.

 

2. Current employees: your employees are a representation of your company. This is another area where monitoring social conversations can be important – do you have employees bad mouthing the company, or sharing proprietary information? It’s relatively easy to find out, and continual monitoring programs will help with this process. Here are some tips to make this an efficient, effective process:

  • Have a solid social media policy in place: employee handbooks should reference the company’s social media policies and expectations. Similar to signing consent for release of information and the ability for phone conversations to be recorded for quality assurance, employees should be required to sign a similar document stating that they reviewed the social media policy, understand it, and will adhere to it as outlined in the employee handbook.
  • Make clear the policy on different social aspects, such as employees connecting socially online with their supervisors, for example. This is the new workplace dating, and while social connections are simply connections and do not signal a deeper relationship in most cases, this is something that needs to be considered. In a similar vein, accounts like LinkedIn need special consideration – if an employee builds contacts during employment, what specifications are in place for post employment? Are those contacts “fair game” for former employees to contact at their new job? Does it depend on the contact? Make sure it is spelled out in your policy.
  • For further protection, some companies will require employees to post a disclaimer on their personal social content. Something along the lines of: “the content posted is my personal opinion and does not represent the opinion of XYZ Corporation.” Of course, this is something that would be more relevant for larger corporations and/or senior members of the company, but something to consider.

 

3. Post- employment: while former employees are on their own and no longer represent your company, social media monitoring can be useful to ensure in this area as well. Here are some tips on using social media monitoring for former employers:

  • Continue to monitor a former employee when non-compete/non-disclosure/non-solicitation factors come into play: this is one area where social media is extremely useful. Similar to insurance companies finding content posted by those fighting for workman’s comp that negates their claim, social media monitoring can help identify breaches.
  • Monitoring adherence to social media policy: hopefully your company’s social media policy outlines what happens when an employee leaves with regard to online content, connections, etc. Ensuring that what is considered “company property” is not being used by former employees can be tough, but again social media monitoring can help with this.

 

Social media has really impacted the employer/employee relationship, and, while the above sounds daunting and too much to monitor, the good news is that there are social media companies who can handle this for you. They have the time, expertise, and software platforms available to make this a painless process. Our company has worked in the social media landscape since 2007, and it’s been riveting to see the evolution of how social content is used, particularly from an employment standpoint.